The GPS World Editorial Advisory Board answers two questions, one about the most promising innovation in satellite navigation, the other asking how good of a remedy multi-constellation receivers are to GNSS vulnerability.
The GPS World Editorial Advisory Board (EAB) answers the question, “Regarding augmentation services such as Galileo HAS, at what accuracy level should public services end and private ones begin?”
GPS World’s Editorial Advisory Board elaborates on the question, “Is the GNSS community failing to exploit the potential of chip-scale atomic clocks (CSAC)?”
GPS World’s Editorial Advisory Board (EAB) discusses the question, ” Should countries such as Brazil build their own GNSS constellations?”
GPS World’s EAB disuss, “Could a new PNT constellation using LEO satellites fully replace the services provided by the four existing GNSS constellations?”
GPS World’s EAB sits down to discuss, “How do/will/should NATO forces integrate GPS and Galileo for position, navigation and time?”
GPS World’s EAB sits down to answer, “What would be required for the United States to develop and deploy a GPS high-accuracy service analogous to Galileo’s HAS?”
Editorial Advisory Board members discuss the “geodesy crisis” and potential issues surrounding the launch or operations of GNSS satellites in MEO.
Follow Us